Minnesota Vikings vs Seahawks Match Player Stats: Complete Breakdown of the 2025 Week 13 Game

The minnesota vikings vs seahawks match player stats from the 2025 NFL Week 13 matchup tell the story of one of Seattle’s most dominant defensive performances of the season. The Seattle Seahawks defeated the Minnesota Vikings 26-0 on November 30, 2025, producing a shutout while forcing five Minnesota turnovers. The result was especially notable because Seattle controlled the game without needing a huge passing performance from quarterback Sam Darnold. Instead, the Seahawks combined efficient offense, a productive rushing attack, strong special teams play and an outstanding defensive display.

For Minnesota, the game was extremely difficult from the opening stages. The Vikings managed only 162 total net yards and struggled to sustain drives, while Seattle produced 219 total net yards and controlled possession for more than 34 minutes. Minnesota also committed 10 penalties for 80 yards, compared with four penalties for 25 yards by Seattle. Those differences helped explain why the Vikings were unable to generate any points despite several opportunities to move the ball.

The minnesota vikings vs seahawks match player stats are particularly interesting because several individual performances stood out on both sides. Seattle’s defense created turnovers at critical moments, Ernest Jones IV delivered two interceptions, and one of those interceptions became an 85-yard touchdown return. Zach Charbonnet supplied Seattle’s only offensive touchdown, while Kenneth Walker III provided consistent production on the ground. On Minnesota’s side, tight end T.J. Hockenson was the team’s leading receiver, but the Vikings’ passing attack never developed enough rhythm to threaten Seattle’s defense.

Minnesota Vikings vs Seahawks Match Player Stats at a Glance

The final score was Seattle Seahawks 26, Minnesota Vikings 0. Seattle’s scoring came from four Jason Myers field goals, an 85-yard interception return by Ernest Jones IV and a 17-yard rushing touchdown by Zach Charbonnet. The Seahawks did not need a traditional offensive shootout to win because their defense repeatedly gave the offense favorable field position and prevented Minnesota from converting those opportunities into points.

Seattle quarterback Sam Darnold completed 14 of 26 passes for 128 yards with no touchdowns and no interceptions. His numbers were modest, but they were more than enough in a game where the defense repeatedly took control. Darnold also benefited from the Seahawks’ rushing game, which produced important yards without requiring him to make difficult throws throughout the afternoon.

Minnesota quarterback Max Brosmer completed 19 of 30 attempts for 126 yards, but he threw four interceptions. Those four turnovers were a major factor in the shutout. The Vikings’ inability to protect the football meant that even when their offense moved the ball, Seattle’s defense could end drives before Minnesota reached scoring range.

Sam Darnold’s Passing Performance

Sam Darnold’s statistics may look ordinary when viewed independently, but they need to be considered within the context of the game. He finished with 128 passing yards on 14 completions from 26 attempts. His completion percentage was not particularly high, but he avoided turnovers and allowed Seattle’s defense to remain the main story of the contest.

Darnold’s role was essentially to manage the game. Seattle did not need him to throw for 300 or 400 yards because the defense repeatedly created favorable situations. His clean turnover column was especially important when compared with Minnesota’s four interceptions. In a game decided by field position and mistakes, protecting the football was arguably more valuable than producing a large passing total.

The quarterback’s performance also demonstrated how an efficient game plan can work without spectacular passing statistics. Seattle moved the ball enough to keep its defense from being overworked, used its running backs effectively and relied on Myers whenever drives stalled. That combination helped the Seahawks build a comfortable advantage without taking unnecessary risks.

Max Brosmer’s Difficult Day for Minnesota

Max Brosmer experienced one of the most challenging games of his young NFL career. His final line of 19 completions on 30 attempts for 126 yards included four interceptions and no touchdown passes. Those numbers show why the Vikings were unable to score.

Brosmer did complete enough passes to suggest that Minnesota was capable of moving the ball in small sections of the field. However, the turnovers completely changed the value of those completions. A quarterback can complete 19 passes and still struggle if multiple drives end with interceptions. Against a defense as aggressive as Seattle’s, every turnover created another opportunity for the Seahawks to control momentum.

The four interceptions also placed additional pressure on Minnesota’s defense. Instead of allowing the Vikings to establish long offensive drives, Seattle repeatedly received possession with opportunities to score or improve field position. That cycle made it increasingly difficult for Minnesota to recover.

Minnesota Vikings Rushing Stats

Minnesota’s rushing attack was led by Jordan Mason, who finished with six carries for 47 yards. His longest run covered 24 yards, giving him an impressive 7.8 yards per carry despite receiving only limited opportunities.

Zavier Scott added three carries for 17 yards, while Aaron Jones carried the ball six times for only three yards. Brosmer recorded one rushing attempt for minus one yard. These numbers demonstrate an important aspect of Minnesota’s offensive struggles: the Vikings did have occasional success running the football, but they did not maintain enough consistency to build their offense around it.

Mason’s 47 yards were especially interesting because his long run demonstrated that Minnesota could find openings against Seattle’s defense. The problem was that those opportunities were not frequent enough. Once Minnesota fell behind and turnovers accumulated, the game situation became less favorable for a balanced offensive approach.

Seattle Seahawks Rushing Stats

Seattle’s rushing attack was more consistent. Kenneth Walker III carried the ball 13 times for 56 yards, averaging more than four yards per carry, while Zach Charbonnet recorded 14 carries for 52 yards and a touchdown. Together, the two backs produced 108 rushing yards.

Charbonnet’s 17-yard touchdown run was particularly important because it gave Seattle a rare offensive touchdown in a game where the defense and kicking game were doing most of the scoring. His production helped the Seahawks maintain control and forced Minnesota to respect the run.

Walker, meanwhile, provided steady production rather than one enormous play. His 56 yards on 13 attempts kept Seattle’s offense moving and helped Darnold avoid carrying the entire offensive workload. Seattle also received smaller contributions from Rashid Shaheed, Myles Gaskin and Brady Russell-related packages, adding depth to the rushing effort.

T.J. Hockenson Leads Minnesota’s Receiving Group

T.J. Hockenson was Minnesota’s most productive receiver in the game. He caught six passes for 59 yards, including a long reception of 29 yards.

Hockenson’s performance was one of the few bright spots for the Vikings’ passing attack. His six receptions accounted for a significant portion of Minnesota’s 126 passing yards, showing that he remained an important option even while Seattle’s defense was creating pressure and turnovers.

His 29-yard reception demonstrated the potential for Minnesota to create explosive plays through the air. However, isolated successful plays could not compensate for the turnovers. The Seahawks consistently forced Minnesota to work for yards, and the Vikings were unable to turn those gains into points.

Justin Jefferson’s Limited Impact

Justin Jefferson finished the game with only two receptions for four yards on six targets. That was an unusually quiet performance for one of the NFL’s premier wide receivers.

Jefferson’s limited production is one of the most striking elements in the minnesota vikings vs seahawks match player stats. A receiver of his caliber normally commands significant attention from opposing defenses, but Seattle succeeded in limiting the impact of Minnesota’s passing game as a whole.

The fact that Jefferson finished with just four receiving yards highlights how thoroughly Seattle disrupted Minnesota’s offensive rhythm. The Seahawks did not simply prevent touchdowns; they prevented Minnesota’s biggest offensive weapon from becoming a major factor.

This also illustrates why individual player statistics need to be viewed within the larger tactical picture. Jefferson’s low numbers were not necessarily an indication of his ability. Instead, they reflected Seattle’s defensive execution and Minnesota’s inability to consistently deliver the ball downfield.

Jordan Addison’s Contribution

Jordan Addison caught five passes for 36 yards, giving him the second-highest receiving total among Minnesota players. His longest reception was 11 yards.

Addison provided a dependable secondary option, but like the rest of Minnesota’s passing offense, he struggled to generate explosive production. Five catches can normally be a useful contribution, but 36 yards over those receptions demonstrates how effectively Seattle limited yards after the catch and downfield opportunities.

The combination of Hockenson’s 59 yards, Addison’s 36 yards and Jefferson’s four yards accounted for most of Minnesota’s significant receiving production. Even with these contributors involved, the Vikings could not reach the end zone.

Seattle’s Receiving Production

Seattle’s receiving statistics were also relatively modest because the Seahawks did not need to throw extensively. A.J. Barner led the team with four receptions for 35 yards, while Cooper Kupp caught three passes for 24 yards. Jaxon Smith-Njigba recorded two receptions for 23 yards.

These numbers are a good example of how a team can win comfortably without producing eye-catching receiving totals. Seattle’s offense was not dependent on one receiver having a huge afternoon. Instead, the Seahawks spread the ball around while relying on their defense, running game and kicking unit.

Barner’s four receptions made him an important short-area option, while Kupp and Smith-Njigba contributed additional first-down opportunities. Their combined production complemented the running game and allowed Darnold to remain conservative.

Ernest Jones IV Becomes a Defensive Star

Ernest Jones IV was arguably the most important individual player in the game. He recorded two interceptions, and one became an 85-yard touchdown return. That defensive touchdown alone represented a major turning point and helped transform Seattle’s defensive dominance into a scoreboard advantage.

An interception return of 85 yards is not merely a statistic; it represents a massive swing in field position and momentum. Minnesota’s offense lost possession, Seattle gained points, and the Vikings were forced to respond while already struggling to move the football.

Jones’s second interception further demonstrated how difficult it was for Minnesota to solve Seattle’s defensive scheme. Four total interceptions by Brosmer meant that Seattle’s secondary was repeatedly able to capitalize on inaccurate or poorly timed throws.

Seattle’s Defensive Pressure

The Seahawks’ defensive performance was the foundation of the victory. The team forced five Minnesota turnovers and limited the Vikings to only 162 total yards. Seattle’s defense also produced pressure that made it difficult for Minnesota to establish a consistent passing rhythm.

One of the notable defensive sequences involved Seattle forcing a fumble after a sack, with the Vikings recovering. The overall pressure nevertheless illustrated the physical nature of the contest and the Seahawks’ willingness to attack Minnesota’s quarterback.

Seattle’s defensive success was not based on one player alone. The secondary generated interceptions, the pass rush created disruption, and the front seven limited Minnesota’s ability to sustain drives. When those components work together, the result can be a shutout.

Jason Myers and Seattle’s Special Teams

Jason Myers played a major role in the final score by making four field goals. His kicks included attempts from 33, 56 and 54 yards, demonstrating that Seattle could turn stalled drives into points.

The kicking performance was especially valuable because Seattle’s offense did not consistently reach the end zone. Instead of leaving possessions without points, the Seahawks converted several opportunities into field goals.

Myers’ long-distance accuracy also changed how Seattle could approach offensive possessions. The Seahawks could be more aggressive on third and fourth downs while knowing that a missed opportunity did not necessarily mean the drive would end scoreless.

Team Statistics Explain the Final Score

The overall team statistics provide a useful explanation for the 26-0 result. Seattle finished with 219 total net yards compared with Minnesota’s 162. The Seahawks also possessed the football for 34:21, while Minnesota had possession for only 25:39.

That possession difference is significant. Football games are often determined by how efficiently teams use their opportunities, and Seattle was able to control the clock while keeping Minnesota’s offense off the field.

Penalties also favored Seattle. Minnesota committed 10 penalties for 80 yards, while Seattle had four penalties for 25 yards. The Vikings therefore lost additional field position through mistakes while simultaneously struggling with turnovers.

Why the Turnover Battle Was So Important

The clearest explanation for the game is the turnover battle. Minnesota committed five turnovers in total, including four interceptions by Brosmer. Seattle converted those mistakes into points and field-position advantages.

Turnovers are particularly damaging when playing a team that is already struggling offensively. Instead of giving Minnesota repeated opportunities to adjust, Seattle’s defense repeatedly ended drives. The Vikings never developed enough rhythm to challenge the Seahawks.

The five-turnover performance also allowed Seattle to win without requiring a huge offensive output. Darnold’s 128 passing yards would not normally be considered a dominant quarterback performance, but in this context they were sufficient.

How the Seahawks Controlled the Game

Seattle’s game plan can be understood through three major elements: protect the football, establish the run and create defensive turnovers.

First, Darnold avoided interceptions. Second, Walker and Charbonnet combined for 108 rushing yards and a touchdown. Third, the defense forced five turnovers. That combination produced a game in which Seattle rarely needed to take significant offensive risks.

The Seahawks also benefited from field goals. Myers converted four attempts, meaning Seattle scored 12 points through the kicking game. Add the defensive touchdown and Charbonnet’s rushing touchdown, and Seattle reached 26 points without needing a high-volume passing attack.

How Minnesota’s Offense Broke Down

Minnesota’s offense faced a difficult combination of defensive pressure, turnovers and limited explosive plays. Although Hockenson and Addison produced receptions, the passing attack never developed enough consistency.

The running game offered occasional flashes, particularly through Mason’s 24-yard long run. However, the Vikings could not repeatedly establish successful rushing situations. When they fell behind, they increasingly depended on the passing game, which allowed Seattle’s defense to focus on Brosmer.

The result was a vicious cycle: Minnesota needed to throw, Seattle pressured the quarterback, turnovers followed, and the Seahawks gained additional opportunities to extend their lead.

Comparing the Quarterbacks

The quarterback comparison is one of the most revealing parts of the minnesota vikings vs seahawks match player stats.

Sam Darnold: 14 completions, 26 attempts, 128 yards, 0 touchdowns and 0 interceptions.

Max Brosmer: 19 completions, 30 attempts, 126 yards, 0 touchdowns and 4 interceptions.

At first glance, Brosmer actually completed five more passes than Darnold. However, the final results were dramatically different because of turnovers. Darnold protected the ball, while Brosmer’s four interceptions repeatedly ended Minnesota possessions.

This is a reminder that completion totals alone do not determine quarterback effectiveness. Turnover avoidance, situational decision-making and field position can be just as important.

Comparing the Running Backs

The running-back statistics also reveal Seattle’s advantage. Kenneth Walker III recorded 56 yards, while Zach Charbonnet added 52 yards and a touchdown. Together they produced 108 yards.

Minnesota’s leading rusher, Jordan Mason, had 47 yards, but the Vikings did not receive the same combined production from their backfield. Aaron Jones managed only three rushing yards on six attempts, which made it difficult for Minnesota to maintain balance.

The Seahawks’ ability to rotate backs helped keep their offense efficient. Walker provided steady production, while Charbonnet added the game’s only offensive touchdown.

Comparing the Wide Receivers and Tight Ends

Minnesota’s receiving leaders were T.J. Hockenson with 59 yards and Jordan Addison with 36. Justin Jefferson, surprisingly, had only four yards.

Seattle’s passing numbers were spread among several players, with A.J. Barner leading the group at 35 yards, followed by Cooper Kupp with 24 and Jaxon Smith-Njigba with 23.

Neither team’s receiving group produced huge numbers. The difference was that Seattle did not need them to. Minnesota needed its passing game to compensate for offensive struggles elsewhere, while Seattle could depend on defense and rushing.

The Importance of Field Position

Field position played a major role in the outcome. Seattle’s defense repeatedly stopped Minnesota drives, while the Seahawks’ offensive possessions were supported by their ability to control the clock.

Myers’ field goals show how Seattle capitalized on field position. Even when drives failed to reach the end zone, the Seahawks were close enough to attempt field goals.

Minnesota, on the other hand, struggled to create sustained drives and often gave Seattle possession through turnovers. That made it extremely difficult for the Vikings to establish favorable field position.

What the Match Says About Defensive Football

The game is a strong example of how defensive football can determine an NFL matchup. Seattle did not need a spectacular offensive performance because its defense produced the decisive plays.

Five turnovers, an 85-yard interception return and consistent pressure created an environment in which Minnesota could not recover. The Seahawks essentially turned defense into offense.

For Minnesota, the lesson was the opposite. Offensive mistakes can erase otherwise positive plays. A 24-yard rushing run or a 29-yard Hockenson reception becomes much less valuable when the following drive ends in a turnover.

Historical Context of Vikings vs Seahawks Matchups

The 2025 matchup was not the only recent meeting between these teams to produce an interesting statistical story. In December 2024, Minnesota defeated Seattle 27-24 in a much closer contest. Sam Darnold, who was with Minnesota at that time, threw for 246 yards and three touchdowns, while Justin Jefferson recorded 10 receptions for 144 yards and two touchdowns. Seattle quarterback Geno Smith passed for 314 yards and three touchdowns in that game.

The contrast between the two games is remarkable. The 2024 meeting was a high-scoring contest decided late, while the 2025 matchup became a 26-0 Seattle shutout.

The change also adds an interesting storyline because Darnold moved from Minnesota to Seattle. In the 2025 meeting, he faced his former team and helped Seattle secure a dominant victory while avoiding the turnovers that had plagued Minnesota.

Key Player Takeaways

Several players stand out when examining the minnesota vikings vs seahawks match player stats.

Ernest Jones IV was the defensive standout because of his two interceptions and 85-yard touchdown return. His performance directly influenced the scoreboard.

Zach Charbonnet was Seattle’s most important offensive scorer, finishing with 52 rushing yards and a touchdown.

Kenneth Walker III provided dependable rushing production with 56 yards.

Sam Darnold managed the game effectively with 128 passing yards and no interceptions.

For Minnesota, Jordan Mason was the most efficient rusher, while T.J. Hockenson was the leading receiver with 59 yards.

Despite those individual contributions, Minnesota’s four interceptions and five total turnovers ultimately overshadowed the positive performances.

Final Analysis of Minnesota Vikings vs Seahawks Match Player Stats

The minnesota vikings vs seahawks match player stats from the 2025 Week 13 matchup show a game dominated by Seattle’s defense, field position and turnover advantage. The Seahawks won 26-0 despite producing only 219 total net yards and just 128 passing yards. Their success came from doing the important things consistently: protecting the football, running effectively, forcing turnovers and converting scoring opportunities through Jason Myers.

Minnesota’s statistics reveal a team that had isolated moments of offensive success but could not string them together. Jordan Mason averaged 7.8 yards per carry, T.J. Hockenson gained 59 receiving yards and Jordan Addison caught five passes. Yet the offense could not overcome four interceptions from Brosmer and five turnovers overall.

Seattle’s victory therefore was not simply a matter of having better raw offensive statistics. It was about efficiency and situational execution. The Seahawks made the most of their possessions, while Minnesota repeatedly gave away opportunities.

The 26-0 scoreline also emphasizes the importance of complementary football. Seattle’s defense created turnovers, its offense protected the lead, its running backs controlled the ground game and its kicker converted field goals. Every phase contributed to the result.

Ultimately, the matchup serves as an excellent example of why individual statistics must be interpreted alongside team statistics. A quarterback can throw for more completions but still lose badly because of interceptions. A receiver can catch several passes without significantly changing the game. A running back can average impressive yards per carry but receive too few opportunities. Conversely, a defense can completely transform a game through turnovers even without producing enormous yardage numbers.

For anyone studying the minnesota vikings vs seahawks match player stats, the biggest takeaway is clear: Seattle won the battle of execution. The Seahawks controlled possession, protected the ball, generated five turnovers, scored a defensive touchdown, received 108 combined rushing yards from Walker and Charbonnet, and converted four field goals. Minnesota’s offensive production was unable to overcome those disadvantages.

The game will therefore be remembered less for spectacular passing statistics and more for Seattle’s defensive dominance. Ernest Jones IV’s interceptions, the Seahawks’ pressure, Charbonnet’s touchdown run, Walker’s steady rushing production and Myers’ accurate kicking combined to produce a complete team victory.

In contrast, Minnesota’s performance demonstrates how quickly an NFL game can unravel when turnovers and penalties accumulate. The Vikings had capable individual contributors, but they could not sustain drives or protect possession. The final 26-0 score reflected that difference and made this matchup one of the clearest examples of Seattle’s defensive strength during the 2025 season.

ALSO READ : Will Howard Injury: Latest Updates, Recovery Timeline, and Career Impact